|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
|||
 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
|||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Articles Community Forums Sponsor:
|
|
Ajax Application Generator Generate database and reporting .NET Web apps in minutes. Quickly create visually stunning, feature-rich apps that are easy to customize and ready to deploy. Download Now!
|
|
#1
September 1st, 2005, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mapping collection of object
I want to map collection of objects. So far in java I was using Vector to hold them and I would be happy to stick with the Vector type instead switching to Set, Bag, List, or Map.
Is there any workaround so one can use Vector to hold objects and still be able to hibernate such a class ? Sincerely, Pawel
|
|
#2
April 17th, 2008, 06:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
hiii
just don't change ur jdk to jdk6.it supports vector and hashtables but these will now change to List(linkedlist...) and Map(HashMap,SortMap....).the main change will be the "Casting" methods which u have to use generics and collections instead of casting
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Articles Community Forums > Programming > Java Development > Mapping collection of object |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
