|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
|||
 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
|||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Articles Community Forums Sponsor:
|
|
SlickEdit: Code in over 40 languages across 7 platforms. SlickEdit’s unmatched power, speed, and flexibility allows even the most accomplished developers to write better code faster. Download a free trial today! |
|
#1
March 11th, 2003, 09:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Article Dicussion: Managed C# versus Unmanaged C++
If you have any questions or comments about this article please post them here.
This forum post relates to this article
|
|
#2
April 17th, 2003, 12:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't see how this could surprise anyone, the CRL used by .net generates a much larger set of IL code than c/c++, and subsequently, a lot more assembly code.
|
|
#3
April 18th, 2003, 08:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This is definitely a true statement. It is obvious that due to the complexity of the .Net framework, C# would perform at a slower rate. What Randy was trying to achieve in the article was merely a comparison between the execution rates between Managed C# and Unmanaged C++ and to show that that there is improvements to be made to the .Net framework.
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Articles Community Forums > Programming > Programming Tools > Article Dicussion: Managed C# versus Unmanaged C++ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
