|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||
 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
|||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think is better, Simplicity or Eye Candy in a design? | |||
| Basic html design with 1/2 graphics max. |    | 6 | 60.00% |
| Loads of gfx! I have ADSL! |    | 4 | 40.00% |
| Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Articles Community Forums Sponsor:
|
|
Free Web 2.0 Code Generator! Generate data entry and reporting .NET Web apps in minutes. Quickly create visually stunning, feature-rich apps that are easy to customize and ready to deploy. Download Now!
|
|
#1
May 10th, 2003, 06:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simplicity vs. Eye Candy
I stumble accross nice looking simple sites with perhaps a banner and maybe 1 more graphic. (mainly hosting sites) and then I see gfx intense sites which look good but don't really highlight their content. For me simplicity wins and a basic HTML design is nicer than some 500k file that takes ages to load on 56k (I have ADSL but I am not inconsiderate of other people's equipment).
|
|
#2
May 10th, 2003, 08:01 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It all depends on the purpose of the site. I hang out on a lot of graphic design sites and coder sites, so, obviously, the general structure of these site will be different, because of their market and intent.
Personally tho, I have cable, and i'm a "designy" kinda person, so i prefer graphic intensive sites :P
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Articles Community Forums > Web Design > Web Development > Simplicity vs. Eye Candy |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
